Post by @0x00string@infosec.exchange

2026-07-23 05:24 UTC

@resiliencetheatre@infosec.exchange cool, good for you. that future isnt on codeberg though. i believe the future is that people who dont want to write code dont, and the rest of us keep working in this field.

Replies (2)

@0x00string@infosec.exchange 2026-07-23 05:25

@resiliencetheatre@infosec.exchange you go have at it though! go fill up other peoples hard drives some more, sizzler. its the future.

Open ##4027885
@resiliencetheatre@infosec.exchange 2026-07-23 05:28

@0x00string@infosec.exchange This Codeberg's terms of use is actually very well formulated: "7. You must not share projects that mostly consist of code written by "generative AI"-tools (including services such as *Claude*, *OpenAI Codex*). Such projects having an unclear copyright status (see requirements § 2 (1) 1 and § 2 (1) 3) and furthermore have little safeguards to ensure that they do not include harmful code (c.f. § 2 (1) 5)." And I fully agree on this. I would not host publicly any AI generated code after seeing this. But equally, what prevents humans to act similarly towards code they publish? This is new era of liability for service providers!

Open ##4027923